|
Eh?
Sept 12, 2004 16:49:52 GMT -5
Post by Belgium Liberation Army on Sept 12, 2004 16:49:52 GMT -5
For those of you who particpate in World Wars, you'll know that in WW10 it was doomed partially due to the claiming of Non-Played nations. Why are we repeating the same mistakes? If you feel the urge to expand, and you border other nations, there is no reason for you to attack a non-played nation.
|
|
|
Eh?
Sept 12, 2004 17:00:01 GMT -5
Post by Germany on Sept 12, 2004 17:00:01 GMT -5
Nations in real life attack neutral nations, do they not? Playerless countries are considered neutral. It is more realistic that you would be able to invade a playerless country. Also, the rule that said you may not move through a playerless country was very unrealistic and just ruined the whole forum right there. All throughout history, nations moved through neutral countries to get to their enemies.
|
|
|
Eh?
Sept 12, 2004 20:27:40 GMT -5
Post by Portugal on Sept 12, 2004 20:27:40 GMT -5
I concur with Germany. As long as it doesn't go overboard...
|
|
|
Eh?
Sept 12, 2004 20:33:57 GMT -5
Post by Belgium Liberation Army on Sept 12, 2004 20:33:57 GMT -5
Mexico, Sweeden (wants to), Germany, Italy, Bulgaria to name a few.
But your the boss.
|
|